Wednesday, January 19, 2022

A SHORT UPDATE FOR JANUARY

 SHORT UPDATE (AT LEAST FOR A WHILE!)

In just the few days since my last rant, a lot of things have popped up.  First, I need to expand on my critique of fusion power.  My description of the fuel needed is incomplete, although it is true that hydrolysis of seawater is necessary to separate the deuterium atoms from the hydrogen atoms.  (1 atom of deuterium for every 6,420 atoms of hydrogen.)  The other component of the fuel is tritium, and this does not occur in nature but is produced by activating lithium in a fission nuclear reactor, so we would need to have some of those reactors around in the future.  Tritium decays to helium in about 25 years, which is why the military needs to replenish its availability in our H2 nuclear warheads and fusion reactors. The large infrastructure, energy requirements, and supply chains necessary to support a fusion energy economy would be huge; and like our current nuclear power infrastructure, it will have a fairly large carbon footprint, making the whole NO CO2 argument pointless. 

China just achieved a milestone in fusion research…a tiny fusion reaction for 17 minutes!  Check out this story…proceed to the end where “story continues,” and look at the video.  A lot of heat to deal with!!

     https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/china-switched-nuclear-fusion-device-204100017.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

While Congress continues to sit on its thumbs, the rest of the world moves on with renewables and Hydrogen.  The energy industry is finally beginning to address a new direction for the future use of Hydrogen in stationary storage for microgrids based on renewable energy.  A solution for the age-old question “what do you do when the sun doesn’t and the wind doesn’t blow?”  Hydrogen and fuel cells, along with current battery technology, future solid-state batteries, and a whole range of new storage and digital technologies, will work in tandem to provide reliable electricity to microgrids, minigrids, picogrids…the concept of THE GRED is changing and expanding.  It is no longer a huge collection of transmission wires linking huge power plants to demands thousands of miles away.  Decentralized generation, using varied local resources, can work in First world, as well as Second and Third world countries.  The manufacture of renewables and their related technologies can/is happening at an ever-increasing rate…much faster than any nuclear option. Can/will we have the political courage to free the development and deployment of these necessary technologies which require both economic and social incentives?  We’ll see!

One last summary of the new nuclear push with SMR by the industry again pins hopes on some 61 different designs, hoping for at least one of them being feasible, cheaper, safer, cleaner? (no mention of wastes produced), and actual need.  TerraPower, the reactor supported by Bill Gates is a sodium-cooled reactor that would require recycling of nuclear waste (reprocessing) for its fuel.  We already know that reprocessing creates huge amounts of other nuclear wastes in liquid form.  Hanford was the government reprocessing site for plutonium production, and today is still uncleanable after billions of dollars spent.  The industry would create another infrastructure component that will demand huge technology and money to operate, let alone deal with the wastes and dispose of them. The infamous Monju sodium reactor in Japan in the early 1900s had a huge sodium fire that shut down that whole reactor program.  TerraPower’s 345MW reactor is to be built in a remote area of Wyoming at the current estimate of $4.1billion and maybe come online by 2028 if it works.  Just another nuclear time and money dream.

The four small reactors slated for Eastern Washington are based on “pebble-bed fuel” ideas that came up about 20 years ago and have never been demonstrated.  Nuscale’s 6 very small reactors project is slated for Utah at a cost estimate of $5.1 billion and to projected to be online by 2029, is already falling behind on time and budget.  Again, these are all unproven technologies that may look good on paper (or a computer screen) but as with past ideas and projects, most have proved to be too technologically, economically, and socially complex.  Even if they were to prove successful, their construction, deployment, etc. would not make a dent in the upcoming renewable supply.

It will be an interesting year, and I am no longer in awe at most of the renewable projects and new technologies that appear every day.  I will try and keep my enthusiastic blogs to a minimum.

The sun is shining, and the wind is blowing!

Some current background:

https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/environment/this-next-generation-nuclear-power-plant-is-pitched-for-washington-state-can-it-change-the-world/

https://www.techgamingreport.com/climate-change-bill-gates-wants-to-recycle-nuclear-waste-with-a-sodium-cooled-reactor/

https://apnews.com/article/climate-technology-business-wyoming-bill-gates-19a36eb0bd65e0999d26c0cc122f6158?mkt_tok=ODUwLVRBQS01MTEAAAGCDGNX-__Kr3B-AMyy3Cct0I7M260COpRdJCboES-8c1RiKViINPtmKGOfCCJRa3UvzK2ce_-ef5LTPi2PoeFOWSIZqc2LAYCtI6018LsCcV2n

https://www.energytech.com/renewables/article/21214105/et-tu-h2-can-truly-green-hydrogen-join-solar-storage-in-overthrowing-the-carbon-majority?utm_source=ET%20Transition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS220114086&o_eid=3444I8578489H9H&rdx.ident%5Bpull%5D=omeda%7C3444I8578489H9H&oly_enc_id=3444I8578489H9H

https://www.eenews.net/articles/new-york-renewable-hydrogen-hub/

 

Saturday, January 15, 2022

Welcome 2022

 WELCOME TO 2022

As 2022 begins, I’m feeling a sense of pessimism with regards to where we are in the US and the world.  We’re still dealing with major issues of the pandemic, climate change, and politics.  I was hoping we would make some giant steps forward, but in reality, the “powers that be”- big money, big tech, the fossil fuel, nuclear, military weapon industries, and Wall Street continue to be the forces pushing our political agendas and stalling the necessary moves I feel common sense deems necessary.  Again, it is just a small handful of rich and powerful people guarding their wealth and political philosophies.  They have perfected their game plan, breeding fear and hate with lies, misstatements, and news media corruption.  Pretty disheartening; but, this stage of human history will pass in time…probably not in my lifetime, and those deniers will be deemed responsible

Climate change is now acknowledged and remains the greatest challenge to the future of our current civilization.  No, we are not going to destroy our planet and its environment.  As predicted over the years, the changes in climate, weather, fires, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, and other related alterations will continue to become more extreme, regardless of what we do right now.  Putting off serious changes will only exasperate what happens in the future.  We will adapt and survive as a species, but the true cost in dollars, human life and suffering on a global scale, and changes to the environment we so depend on will be stunning and catastrophic.  Technology can only help us so much.  Once again, this handful of people will be remembered in history for their blatant greed and ignorance creating a major shift in civilization in a rather short time. What we are doing now…our policies and strategies are what Ms. Thunberg says: "blah, blah, blah!"  Shame!

 So much for my philosophizing.  A look at those issues that have been so deeply ingrained in my life's work continues to offer optimism as well as frustration.  Renewables (solar, wind, oceans, geothermal) are making great strides despite all the obstacles that continued to be thrown in their paths.  Private investment continues to drive development and deployment.  Aside from the slow progress here in the US, huge changes are occurring all over the world.  Australia, Singapore, Northern Europe, and even China, are realizing the future potentials and are stepping up production of renewable generation and coupled electricity storage.  Batteries are the hot thing now, and that technology will continue to grow, and new efficient and affordable technologies will be developed.  Green Hydrogen (again the ultimate storage solution) is being advanced all over the world.  Coupled with PV and wind, the new technologies in hydrolysis and fuel cells are starting to make their way into our varied energy markets.  There still seems to be a push for H2/fuel cell vehicles, which will play a major role in fixed base situations, and air, ship, and fleet applications.  I don’t think H2 cars will be that important in the future.  I still believed that renewable electricity generation splitting storable H2 from water, which will then be reconstituted back into electricity when the demand is there.  So simple…happens all the time in nature.  The technology is there.  We just need to push the research, development, manufacture, demand, and political will for it to occur.  New industry, jobs, sustainability, decentralized, low emissions and wastes…so many positives.  Right now, it competes for fossil fuel dollars, and that industry continues to place obstacles wherever they can.  In California, rooftop solar is so cheap that the utilities are fighting to make it more expensive by charging tariffs on its deployment.  It is threatening their moneymaking model which has always been based on centralized big power plants and a giant grid to move that power around.  That is all changing, especially with the impacts of climate change, not only here but in all the "grids" around the US.  Who owns the grids?  Private investors, utilities, and big business own them and run them for profit.  So as the concept of small, local, decentralized mini-grids appears to make economic sense to consumers, big changes are in store.  The new buzz phrase is "it's the grid, stupid!"

Now to Nuclear Power, which is desperately trying to stay viable as a source of electricity for the future.  The huge public relations push today is remarkable, filled with half-truths, misstatements, remarkable omissions, and blatant lies that are unprecedented since the beginning of the climate hoax campaign forty years ago.  The current huge reactor technology is dead…the new generation by the French, China, Westinghouse in the US, and even the UK and Germany will never be built or come online.  The push now is the "small modular reactors" (SMR) being touted by the industry as being safer? cheaper? cleaner? necessary? All just PR green-wash.  The bottom line is that the biggest issue never really addressed is the creation high-level, long-lived, dangerous wastes, to which there is NO solution other than somehow containing it somewhere for tens of thousands of years.  The new SMRs, which currently only exist on paper (or a computer file!) has never been demonstrated to work, and their specialized fuel would require a whole new infrastructure, and would, in reality, generate more radioactive waste issues than current reactors.  The costs…current and future dollars, impacts from malfunctions and accidents, normal environmental contamination, and human health issues, are NOT being addressed or even mentioned.  The fact that a nuclear reaction does not generate CO2 does not mean the huge infrastructure is carbon-free.  This is just a push by a desperate industry to glean public dollars for their enrichment.  The size of these proposed reactors ranges from 50-250MW and supposedly would fit into the microgrids that will be built all over this country and the world.  It will take years of testing, certification, and construction before even the first few are installed.  By contrast, Dutch Shell Oil, forced to move towards renewables, is currently building a 200MW hydrogen electrolysis plant in Rotterdam, which will be fueled by solar electricity from a 759MW offshore wind farm.  That is happening right now!  It's a shame that the US is again behind the curve of real progress in renewable energy.  The measly things we are doing could explode into amazing new technologies and deployments creating so many clean, sustainable jobs while dealing with the CO2 problem that the nuclear industry is now so concerned with.

But wait, enter now the most amazing solution to all our energy problems…unlimited energy from nuclear FUSION.  Wow!  Billions of new dollars are now being pumped into companies that are promising cheap, safe, clean unlimited electricity from the fusion hydrogen atoms.  Sound familiar?  Fusion has been scientifically studied for decades, with small progressive steps being made in technologically applying physics to this awesome phenomenon.  It is the same technology that occurs in the core of the sun, and we want to produce it here on earth in some kind of manmade structure.  Aside from the huge dollar costs, the radioactive wastes created by the neutrons released in the fusion process will have to be contained and managed, and a whole new infrastructure will be needed to create isolate the fuel of deuterium (from seawater) and lithium, which already is in a global competition for batteries. Then there is the issue of how and where a fusion reactor can/will be built.  The MAJOR scientific problem is HEAT!!!  A fusion reaction would release energy in the form of heat…Hundreds of Millions of degrees!  This heat supposedly can be contained by a magnetic plasma.  The big question has always been and still remains…what to do with that heat, once we get a continuous fusion reaction!!!  Current nuclear fission plants can achieve many thousands of degrees in an uncontrolled reaction. (Nuclear bombs, meltdowns at Chernobyl and Fukushima) They are normally controlled to operate in the hundreds of degrees, just like most steam-generated fossil fuel electricity plants.  A big part of those structures is the cooling towers, ocean outfall pipes, and other means of taking the generated waste heat and disposing it into the environment.  How will hundreds of million degrees be released?  The biggest challenge right now in the research is how to contain that heat…what kinds of materials can we invent to deal with that heat outside of the plasma, and how to transfer some of that heat to a steam generator so we can spin a turbine and produce electricity at 33% efficiency!  Talk about archaic technology…it’s again, “like using a chainsaw to cut butter!” We already have a fusion reactor, and it delivers its heat (sometimes too much!) to us from 93 million miles away.  Go think, or not!

On a positive note, the Humboldt Bay Nuclear Reactor is gone…decommissioned to the tune of well over one billion dollars.  The 6 casks containing the high-level waste fuel remain on site, and as of now, will continue to be monitored and guarded for the near future, at a cost of $10m? per year.  Concern about the impact of climate change on the storage site, as well as the life expectancy of the casks is the next issue to be addressed.  A lot hinges on the wonderful work Jennifer Marlowe at HSU is doing, and what happens with PG&E and their decommissioning of Diablo Canyon, as well as the decom work being done at San Onofre.  It is all so complex and convoluted with technology, money, and politics, and it will never end!

My dismay continues at the current state of our politics, our social fabric, and the strangling control of our economic dollars.  It has always been the case; but with energy, it is our policy is rooted in the 1952 Paly Commission Report on our energy future, when President Eisenhower decided to take the hard path pushed by the fossil fuel industry and the nuclear bomb building industry, pushing us down the path of the "peaceful atom."  He rejected the softer path which was supported by the recent development of the photovoltaic cell, and the other budding non-carbon-based environmentally sustainable technologies which we're striving for today.  So much lost time!  We will get through this.  Let the sun shine and the wind blow!

 Some interesting current reads…believe what you want:

https://reneweconomy.com.au/shell-to-power-200mw-hydrogen-plant-with-offshore-wind-farm/?utm_source=pocket_mylist

 https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2022/01/02/fueled-by-billionaire-dollars-nuclear-fusion-enters-a-new-age/?mkt_tok=ODUwLVRBQS01MTEAAAGBxEC37WQX_3ReHeNdgxCI2zgsHFTd_GXMUZnb6NdZuh_6tgPMehGEOiHAmFwpiENhv3VLzFiy1-2a0Wc1qacjCWdF5MP5lx03Hq9IfeDgxVxu&sh=75e6ae9429f3&utm_source=pocket_mylist

 https://www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/articles/entry/us-still-doesnt-know-how-and-where-it-will-store-its-growing-pile-of-nuclear-waste/?utm_source=pocket_mylist

 https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/18/nuclear-waste-why-theres-no-permanent-nuclear-waste-dump-in-us.html?utm_source=pocket_mylist

 https://www.techgamingreport.com/climate-change-bill-gates-wants-to-recycle-nuclear-waste-with-a-sodium-cooled-reactor/

 https://news.yahoo.com/us-affirms-interpretation-high-level-205011069.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall