The Big Attack on Renewables

Big oil is going all out to squash renewables, through what seems like how we get things done today, the spread of misinformation, propaganda, and lies. The reality is that the subsidies for renewables are a small fraction of the total subsidies for oil, coal, gas, and nuclear.  Many of our energy policies make it difficult for small companies (like Solyndra) to survive without some kind of support…policy, financial, whatever.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/14/house-votes-to-phase-out-energy-loan-guarantee-program-after-solyndra/?test=latestnews

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2012/09/21/Nuclear-Attack-on-Wind-Turbines-Energy-Wars-Begin.aspx#page1

An excellent article talks about the energy situation in California, without the 2200MW from the damaged San Onofre reactors. 

This explains peak power (hot summer daytime when demand is high) which is NOW being met with solar, and what the future could hold.  California survived a usual hot summer without any blackouts, etc.  Never came close to maximizing the available amount of electricity available.

http://www.scpr.org/news/2012/10/09/34569/california-plans-energy-future-without-san-onofres/

So while we’re talking about subsidies and investment in the future, nuclear fusion has been in the news.  “After spending more than $5 billion to build and operate a giant laser installation the size of a football stadium, the Energy Department has not achieved its goal of igniting a fusion reaction that could produce energy to generate power or simulate what happens in a nuclear weapon.  If the main goal is to achieve a power source that could replace fossil fuels, we suspect the money would be better spent on renewable sources of energy that are likely to be cheaper and quicker to put into wide use”.  This from MIT.

Even if ignition is achieved in the laboratory in the next several years, scaling up to a demonstration plant will cost billions and may ultimately show that fusion is not a practical source of power.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/opinion/sunday/a-big-laser-runs-into-trouble.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0

There are still some optimists…they probably get government funding!

As for wind power, it is almost cost competitive today without subsidies, and the potential is huge not only here but throughout the world.

http://thegreenmiles.blogspot.com/2012/09/nuclear-power-operator-complains-wind.html#.UHWq1a6jN8H

http://inhabitat.com/carnegie-institution-study-finds-there-is-enough-wind-power-to-meet-global-energy-demand/

Solar power continues to grow, and if we don’t invest in it, others will.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/02/us-sumitomo-idUSBRE89111I20121002?feedType=RSS&feedName=environmentNews

China won’t let its renewable industry die…it will “subsidize” it throughout the world…to their benefit.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/05/business/global/glut-of-solar-panels-is-a-new-test-for-china.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1349889418-8E+fObiTYJFIdaBLihm+0A

I paid $4.77/gallon for gas the other day.  Remember, US oil production is at it’s highest on more than 10 years, and we are exporting a lot of what we do produce here…drill, baby, drill…will get us lower gas prices?  It’s the same “message” we are hearing about renewables…big fossil business profits. 

Let the sun shine, and the wind blow….

Update In the Middle of Summer

It’s been a while since I’ve updated my gleaning of what’s going on out there in the real world.

Things in Japan, a year and a half after the nuclear boondoggle, are still in quite a mess.  The cleanup is very slow and expensive, mountains of waste are being generated that have to go somewhere for a very long time, and the people are finally realizing that they have been had by the nuclear utilities.  Our radiological tech here at Humboldt Bay has been able to monitor and record a very small amount of radioactivity here from the release at Fukushima (it has a very distinct fingerprint!)  And Japan is surviving the loss of output from 53 of their 55 nuclear units.

http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201207240087

http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/07/22/12884007-reports-workers-told-to-underplay-fukushima-radiation-dosage?lite

They must have heard from Ann Coulter!

http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201207240087

http://kwgn.com/2012/08/14/mutant-butterflies-found-near-japans-tsunami-damaged-nuclear-plant-2/

http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201208200085

In the US, nuclear units have had their share of leaks and shutdowns.  A lot of money is going to have to be spent upgrading many units, and we’ll see if ratepayers agree to higher rates, or whether another bailout is called for.  Canada has an oversupply of electricity from their nukes, and has to take a loss by selling it to New York.  Even the big boys are starting to see the economic demise of the nuclear industry.

http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/blog/morning-edition/2012/07/progress-nuke-will-cost-duke-energy-at.html

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-07-26/heat-sends-u-dot-s-dot-nuclear-power-production-to-9-year-low

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-08-01/edison-sees-possible-generation-unit-bankruptcy-nuclear-probes

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorialopinion/article/1237064--why-are-we-paying-n-y-to-take-our-electricity

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/viewart/20120810/NEWS/308100038/Nuclear-plant-dredge-Cedar-River

Renewables in California, the rest of the country, as well as the whole world continues to make incremental progress in spite of all that the fossil industry tries to impede its development.  With very high temperatures in the past month in California, the grid has averaged a 20% surplus of available electricity, in spite of the shut down of  2000MW from the troubled San Onofre nuclear units.  Since the demand is highest when the sun is shining, the new solar facilities have done what they are supposed to do…produce electricity!  The wholesale cost of all electricity in the west has not increased very much…as a matter of fact, it has averaged between 2-3 cents/kwh, about the same as it has been for years.  Even the state of Georgia is now (20 years late) beginning to see the value in solar.

http://www.caiso.com/outlook/SystemStatus.html

http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Stat-of-the-Day-Californias-Big-Utilities-at-20.6-Percent-Renewables-in-2/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+greentechsolar+%28GreentechSolar%29

http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/news/news_detail.cfm/news_id=18475

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jackperkowski/2012/07/27/china-leads-the-world-in-renewable-energy-investment/

http://www.macon.com/2012/07/08/2088585/first-big-ga-power-solar-project.html#storylink=rss

http://www.examiner.com/article/the-u-s-is-falling-behind-other-countries-renewable-energy?cid=rss

So life goes on, gasoline prices are still high, due to the bungled refinery practices at Chevron.  With record refinery prices last year, you would think they would have re-invested some back into maintenance and infra-structure! 

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/08/14/chevron-considered-replacing-pipe-blamed-for-refinery-fire/

Fires in California and Idaho, drought in the Midwest, failed corn and soybean crops, low water in the Mississippi…hey...it’s the world we choose!

Don’t forget to vote in November!

Climate Change

For what it’s worth….

Richard Muller, for many years a Koch brothers funded mouthpiece as a “reputable”, “honorable”, “real scientist” climate change denier, has turned traitor.  His new study at UC Berkeley, 25%funded by the Koch brothers show overwhelming data that human induced climate change is occurring.  Why the change??…I guess they didn’t offer him enough money????  Maybe he is a “real” scientist and has finally analyzed his own data and that of the other 97% climate scientists, and has some moral principles to boot!

http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0730/Prominent-climate-change-denier-now-admits-he-was-wrong-video

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/03/28/207772/koch-richard-muller-gore-cicerone-polar-bears-friedman/

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/campaigns/global-warming-and-energy/polluterwatch/koch-industries/

http://berkeleyearth.org/donors/

It’s been quite a year so far………………

Unstated costs of Nuclear Power

While most concern is about the high cost of constructing new nuclear power plants, the real dilemma is in the “hidden” costs of the back end…the  waste/decommissioning issues.

The industry has always and still falsely asserted that nuclear power is the cheapest way to generate electricity.  This premise is based on a real slight of hand in hiding and not accounting for the “true” and real costs associated with the kwhs produced AFTER the plant has run its life.

We are still being told that nukes produce electricity at 1.5 to 3 cents/kwh.  This may be true, and is referred to as O&M (operating and maintenance) costs.  This usually includes fuel costs, and the day to day running of the plant.  It DOES NOT include capital investment, financing, major retrofits, decommissioning, and waste management.  If we apply the SAME cost analysis, solar O&M costs are less than 1 cent/kwh…the fuel is free, and operating cost are really negligible.  In many cases, the capital investment in solar is cheaper than today’s nuclear, and those costs are coming down.

The high “cost” of solar is due to our bookkeeping methodology, which discriminates against solar because the sun only shine for about a third of the time versus a power plant that runs full time.  There is no differentiation on the value of the electricity.  (More on this later.)

Meanwhile, here is an interesting piece from today’s news. 

http://www.wbay.com/story/19043238/nuclear-waste-being-hauled-out-of-wisconsin-plant

The La Crosse reactor was a small 50MW nuke, similar to the Humboldt Bay nuke, that was shut down in 1987.  The spent fuel has been stored in a wet pool for 25 years.  At Humboldt Bay, the cost of maintaining the pool when it was operative was about $1 million/yr.  The estimated cost of putting the La Crosse fuel into dry storage is $45m.  So, we have about $70m in waste management that did NOT appear on the customer’s energy bill.  Somebody is paying for that now…and the final bill is not in.  Security at Humboldt Bay today is around $12m/yr for the 5 dry casks, and this waste may stay on site for the next 20…50…??? years.   And we don’t know how/if/where/how much this spent fuel will be dealt with in the future.  Like Humboldt Bay, the decommissioned Trojan plant is costing the Northwest ratepayers some $10-15m/yr…an unidentified “tax” on their monthly bill, that will probably never go away…paying for the “cheap” electricity generated back in the late ‘70’s and early ‘80’s.

The NRC just approved Indian Point’s conversion to dry cask storage.

http://peekskill.patch.com/articles/nrc-approves-entergy-plan-for-spent-fuel

Interesting issue here is that the fuel will be placed in a transfer cask, transported out of the fuel building, and then re-transferred into the permanent cask.  This has to be done underwater because of shielding requirements, and involves multiple handling of the fuel…very expensive, but probably cheaper than installing a larger crane in the old radioactive building.  No cost estimate on this procedure has been given; BUT, it will be paid for by the consumers, some of whom may have benefited from the “cheap” nuclear electricity generated by that fuel in the past. 
All this is happening/going to happen at all of the 105 nuclear plants we have in the US.  Expensive?  Who pays?  Cheap, cost effective electricity?  And then of course, what will the cost of final disposition of all the spent fuel be…Yucca Mountain cost $14 billion before it was abandoned, and the estimate in 2002 was over $100 billion to deal with this stuff in the future.  I’m sure that cost has not come down as rapidly as the cost of Chinese solar.

So, we’re being hornswaggled…from the front and rear!  We most likely won’t be building anymore new nukes, so we just need to keep bending over! 

Fiscal conservatism…cost effectiveness…big money business at its finest.

Comparing Costs of Solar and Nuclear

In a recent Forbes article, the most glaring parameter is that the sun doesn’t always shine…a standard availability being 20-30%.  So, if you compare that solar production strictly against a base-load generator with a 70-80% capacity, you come up with a very big negative for solar, as well as other renewable. 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2012/07/08/the-direct-costs-of-energy-hydronuclear-best-solar-still-lagging/

What is missing in this cost analysis is the “true” value of the electricity…other than just a  price per KWH.  Solar is peak demand KWHs…especially valuable and most probably more than cost effective and competitive on hot summer days when air-conditioning demand is at its highest.  There is usually no distinction between cost/kwh during the day and night when demand is low, and when a lot of costly generators are turned off.  As with so many aspects of the environment/climate change, the “true” costs and implications are marginalized.

Another strike against solar PV is the life expectancy of the panels itself.  For many years, a 20 year life was used…I guess today it is 25 years.  The argument was/is that there is not enough actual use history to extend that timeframe, even though those panels may work for 50, 60, ?? years.  A nuclear power plant has a license for 40 years, and most industrial facilities have a 30-40 year life expectancy.  So, if you depreciate, spread cost out over that life-expectancy timeframe, whatever economic  gimmick you use, etc...solar is at a big disadvantage.

http://www.nmsea.org/Curriculum/7_12/Cost/calculate_solar_cost.htm#Calculation%20of%20life-cycle%20cost%20per%20kilowatt-hour

One last point I usually make in my arguments is that the real cost of nuclear decommissioning and radioactive waste disposal is extremely understated.  Here at the Humboldt Bay Reactor which we are decommissioning, the cost is in excess of $0.12/kwh for the electricity it produced in its 14 year run.  The cost of dry storage of the fuel is about $12 million /yr until 2020…and after that, who knows what.

I know this is all so complex, and I am not an economist, but for all these years I have felt slighted by the “powers that be” in all my activism for sustainable, renewable energy. 

Happy 4th of July, America!

A few current news trends as we celebrate the birthday of the great American dream.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501363_162-57461141/$12.3-billion-hanford-plant-sees-new-costs-delays/

Gee, we could have used the Solyndra money to help pay for this!  Tsk, tsk.

http://www.thestate.com/2012/07/01/2337595/nj-eyes-sc-site-for-radioactive.html

You’ve got to put it somewhere…SC is probably as good a place as any!  Texas, Florida, Oklahoma, Wisconsin???????

http://www.ajc.com/business/japan-nuke-utility-shareholders-1465305.html

Nuclear subsidies?  The world over!  “The total amount of public money injected into Japan’s TEPCO is now at 2.5 trillion yen ($30.7 billion).”  Here in the US, we could have probably built one and a half new reactors for that amount.

Today, California is expected to hit a summer peak demand of  about 35,000MW, with available resources of 45,000MW…that gives about a 25% reserve…not bad.  All this without the 2200MW from the shut down San Onofre nukes.

http://www.caiso.com/outlook/SystemStatus.html

As Japan begins to come to its senses and initiates investments into renewables, the demand for PV, wind, and other technologies will increase.  Too bad the US has abandoned its renewables industries…most of the product demand and jobs will go to China and Germany.  Another lost opportunity due to short-sightedness!

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-01/softbank-to-build-japan-biggest-solar-plant-as-incentive-starts.html

http://www.thejapannews.net/index.php?sid/207098258/scat/3a8a80d6f705f8cc

As the world deals with extreme weather, we continue to  spend our “intelligent” efforts dealing with gay marriage, immigration, minimizing healthcare for the poor, and further enriching the rich with more riches.

'CATASTROPHIC' DAMAGE TO POWER GRIDS...

This is just the beginning…will it get better?  Or worse?  Do you believe the scientists, or the fossil fuel industry lackeys?  Time will tell…eventually the economic damage will reach such proportions that even the real fiscal conservatives will have their eyes and ears opened…as well as their pocketbooks.

Happy 4^th of July, America!  The best democracy money can buy.

Off to Weiser tomorrow, so I thought I would update my thoughts and insights before I become "brainless."

The nuclear industry continues to stumble along.  In spite of increased cost estimates, the two Georgia reactors are still under construction, and it will be interesting to see if they are finished at all, let alone on schedule and on budget as promised.  Increased cost estimates have  failed to deter the continued push for new reactors in Florida and for the TVA in Tennessee.  After all, it's mostly public money, and CEO's are getting big salaries on all this.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/business/energy/progress-energys-levy-county-nuclear-project-carries-on-despite-early-and/1232464  and
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/05/utiliites-tva-wattsbar-idUSL2E8F548S20120405

Nuclear waste was issued a big blow when the courts ruled that on-site storage of fuel will be limited to 30 years.  Oh, what to do, what to do.  The Blue Ribbon Commission said it so well…there is NO solution to the nuclear waste issue.  So, we will thrown the ball around again, spend billions of taxpayer dollars trying to find a "political" solution, since it seems we've given up on SCIENCE in this country.
http://www.newstimes.com/news/article/Court-rules-against-60-years-of-storage-of-3620443.php

Things aren't any better in Europe.  They are just beginning to address the extreme high costs of decommissioning, and they haven't even begun to look at the waste issue.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/how-hard-is-it-to-dismantle-150-nuclear-reactors-europes-about-to-find-out/2012/06/09/gJQA2EH0PV_blog.html?wprss=rss_policy
It's all still a dream.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-06-06/french-nuclear-watchdog-says-orders-won-at-too-low-prices.html

Meanwhile, in spite of the enormous and expensive effort by the Kock brothers and their "Americans for Prosperity" and other extreme right-wing  big money fossil fuel climate change deniers, renewables are doing quite well in the world.
http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2012/06/11/1981737/record-investment-in-renewable.html#storylink=rss  and
http://www.ocean-resources.com/industry-news.asp?newsid=11671

Too bad the old guard "Oldsmobiles" are spending so much money opposing the "Green Revolution."  Think of the jobs, the local developments, the sustainability, and the economic and environmental benefits we would be having now, if only….
But of course, it's all about education…..
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/06/12/498376/americans-for-prosperity-plans-protest-against-extremist-kids-flying-kites-in-support-of-wind/
and it's all about money…
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/report-gop-outside-groups-plan-spend-more-1-142453576.html

Too bad about Solyndra…just shocking!
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-05-28/bankrupt-nuclear-waste-firm-impact-services-gets-deadline   and
http://markey.house.gov/press-release/markey-burgess-call-gao-investigation-doe-support-near-bankrupt-usec
Fire up those subsidies.

Meanwhile, those dumb Chinese are moving head with new companies with a lot of help from the government.
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2012/05/green_jobs_how_china_and_solyndra_left_america_s_solar_power_companies_fighting_each_other_for_scraps_.single.html
and in Taiwan
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan-business/2012/06/02/343055/Cheng-Uei.htm

It is going to be an interesting summer in California with two of its big nuclear reactors shut down.  The loss of 2200MW from San Onofre will be displaced by the 5000MW of renewables now available on the grid.  More later.

Enjoy the summer!